
WHAT IF THE THING HOLDING US CAPTIVE IS SOMETHING WE KEEP DEFENDING?
Sunday was rainy, but being together at church felt especially comforting. We shared a wonderful fellowship brunch afterward, and I left grateful for our church family, the conversations around the table, and a sermon that stayed with me long after I came home.
It left me thinking about how easily we can recognize bondage in somebody else’s life while giving it a respectable name in our own.
Someone else is controlling. We are protecting our standards. Someone else is bitter. We have good reasons to remember what happened. Someone else needs approval. We just don’t want to disappoint anyone.
And somewhere in all those explanations, we can stop asking whether the way we are living is actually free.
The sermon brought us into Galatians, where Paul was defending the freedom believers had received through Christ. People were trying to require Gentile believers to follow the Mosaic law as a condition of belonging. Paul refused to surrender the truth of the gospel to those demands. Being made right with God could not be earned through works of the law. (Galatians 2:1–5, 16.)
I keep thinking about how that pressure must have sounded coming from people who believed they were protecting what was right.
That is what makes this uncomfortable. A burden can be presented as a spiritual responsibility. Something can sound serious, disciplined and religious, and still ask people to earn what Christ has already given.
In Acts 15, Peter reminded the church that God had given the Holy Spirit to the Gentiles and purified their hearts through faith. He challenged the attempt to place a burden on them that their own ancestors had been unable to bear. Their salvation, like his own, rested in the grace of Jesus. (Acts 15:8–11.)
That should make us careful about the conditions we add to somebody else’s place at the table.
There is a difference between helping someone grow in faith and making them feel that God’s acceptance depends on becoming acceptable to us.
I wonder how often we confuse those two.
We can become so invested in being recognized as good Christians that we spend more energy maintaining the appearance than examining the heart underneath it. We know how to speak in church. We know which opinions will be welcomed. We know how to look composed while carrying resentment we have no intention of surrendering.
An apology, however, might cost us something. So might admitting that the person we dismissed had a point. So might doing the right thing when the people whose approval we enjoy would rather we stayed quiet.
Those are the places where faith becomes personal.
One part of Galatians that especially stays with me is Paul confronting Peter. Peter had eaten with Gentile believers, then withdrew because he was afraid of a particular group. Other people followed his example. His fear of their judgment began shaping behavior that contradicted the gospel he believed. (Galatians 2:11–14.)
If Peter could be pulled off course by the desire to avoid disapproval, I certainly need to pay attention to what that desire is doing in me.
Whose reaction am I afraid of? What truth becomes harder for me to live when certain people enter the room?
It is easy to say that Christ leads my life when following Him costs me nothing socially.
But the sermon did not stop with religious burdens. It also brought us into Romans 6, where Paul rejects the idea that grace gives us permission to continue living under sin’s control. Through union with Christ in His death and resurrection, we are called into a new life. Freedom from earning salvation does not mean that everything we desire becomes good for us. (Romans 6:1–14.)
That reaches into ordinary life more deeply than we may want it to.
If my anger decides how I speak, how free am I in that moment? If the need to win makes me willing to wound someone, what is directing me? If I cannot receive correction without turning the other person into an enemy, what am I protecting?
I can insist that I have a right to behave a certain way. I still need to ask what that behavior is producing.
Being able to justify something is not the same as being free from it.
Our pastor described a narrow mountain ridge, with a steep drop on either side. Walking it requires attention. That picture made sense to me because the sermon named two dangers: trying to earn our standing with God through religious performance, and using grace to excuse the desires that keep ruling us.
Both pull us away from a life surrendered to Christ.
And surrender is difficult when we have become attached to our explanations.
I know how much easier it is to explain a reaction than to examine it. Exhaustion is real. Hurt is real. Disappointment is real. God knows all of that. But I still have to let Him address what I do with it.
Otherwise, I can carry the same habits for years, call them my personality, and expect everyone around me to keep absorbing the consequences.
The sermon ended with abiding in Christ. In John 15, Jesus describes a branch that depends on the vine to bear fruit. The life that produces the fruit comes through remaining in Him. (John 15:4–5.)
I find that both comforting and confronting.
I do not have to manufacture a transformed life through sheer determination. I do have to remain close enough to Christ to receive His correction, trust His love and follow His direction when my own impulses want something else.
That means taking faith into the conversation where I feel defensive. Into the decision nobody will see. Into the moment when I could be cruel and get applause for it.
Sunday’s sermon gave me something I want to carry into this week: the willingness to examine what I have been excusing.
Because before I defend something with “that’s just who I am,” I need to ask whether it belongs in the person Christ is teaching me to become.
What am I still protecting that I need to place in His hands?


Comments